🔗 Share this article

American legal authorities have asserted that a Libyan national man freely admitted to being involved in attacks directed at US citizens, comprising the 1988 Lockerbie bombing and an unsuccessful attempt to target a American government official using a booby-trapped garment.

Statement Particulars

Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi is alleged to have confessed his role in the deaths of 270 people when the aircraft was destroyed over the Scotland's town of the region, during interrogation in a Libyan detention facility in the year 2012.

Known as the suspect, the senior individual has stated that multiple masked men pressured him to deliver the admission after intimidating him and his relatives.

His lawyers are trying to block it from being utilized as testimony in his trial in Washington next year.

Legal Conflict

In reply, legal counsel from the American justice department have declared they can demonstrate in court that the statement was "voluntary, credible and correct."

The availability of Mas'ud's alleged admission was first disclosed in the year 2020, when the United States declared it was accusing him with building and priming the bomb utilized on Flight 103.

Legal Team Assertions

The family man is charged of being a former high-ranking officer in Libya's intelligence agency and has been in American custody since 2022.

He has stated not responsible to the allegations and is scheduled to face trial at the US court for the the capital in spring.

The defendant's legal team are trying to prevent the jury from being informed about the confession and have filed a petition asking for it to be excluded.

They assert it was secured under pressure following the overthrow which toppled Colonel Gaddafi in 2011.

Alleged Pressure

They say previous members of the dictator's regime were being targeted with illegal deaths, seizures and abuse when Mas'ud was abducted from his dwelling by armed persons the following year.

He was moved to an unregistered detention center where additional inmates were reportedly beaten and abused and was by himself in a small room when three hooded individuals gave him a solitary sheet of paper.

His lawyers stated its scripted information started with an command that he was to admit to the Pan Am Flight 103 attack and an additional violent act.

Significant Terror Events

The suspect claims he was ordered to remember what it indicated about the incidents and repeat it when he was interrogated by someone else the following morning.

Being concerned for his security and that of his children, he stated he thought he had no choice but to acquiesce.

In their answer to the legal team's motion, legal counsel from the federal prosecutors have declared the judge was being requested to exclude "highly relevant testimony" of Mas'ud's responsibility in "multiple major terrorist attacks targeting American people."

Prosecution Counterarguments

They assert the suspect's version of occurrences is unbelievable and untrue, and assert that the contents of the statement can be verified by trustworthy separate testimony collected over several periods.

The government attorneys claim the defendant and fellow former officials of the former leader's intelligence service were held in a hidden detention facility operated by a faction when they were interviewed by an experienced Libyan law enforcement official.

They contend that in the chaos of the post-uprising era, the center was "the safest environment" for the defendant and the other personnel, given the conflict and resistance sentiment widespread at the time.

Questioning Particulars

Based to the law enforcement official who questioned the suspect, the center was "efficiently operated", the prisoners were not restrained and there were no signs of coercion or coercion.

The official has said that over 48 hours, a confident and well defendant explained his role in the bombings of Pan Am 103.

The FBI has also claimed he had acknowledged creating a bomb which exploded in a Berlin club in 1986, killing several individuals, including multiple American military personnel, and harming dozens additional.

Other Allegations

He is also alleged to have detailed his involvement in an conspiracy on the safety of an anonymous US Secretary of State at a public event in the Asian country.

The suspect is reported to have stated that a person accompanying the American politician was bearing a explosive-laden overcoat.

It was the defendant's mission to activate the device but he chose not to proceed after discovering that the person bearing the coat did not understand he was on a fatal assignment.

He chose "not to activate the device" although his superior in the agency being present at the moment and inquiring what was {going on|happening|occurring